
ArXiv, a popular platform for preprint academic research, is taking a new step to attempt to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop.
If a paper has “incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation,” such as hallucinated references or “meta-comments” left by an LLM, authors will be banned from ArXiv for a year, according to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv’s section chair of its computer science section. Future ArXiv submissions will also have to be accepted at “a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”
Here’s what he said on X:
Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name …
Read the full story at The Verge.




![arXiv implements 1-year ban for papers containing incontrovertible evidence of unchecked LLM-generated errors, such as hallucinated references or results. [N]](https://ai-maestro.online/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/arxiv-implements-1-year-ban-for-papers-containing-incontrove-ai-768x768.jpg)