ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

“`html

• ArXiv, the repository for preprint academic research, has announced new rules to ban authors of papers that contain AI-generated work deemed inappropriate or plagiarized.
• The chair of the computer science section at ArXiv, Thomas Dietterich, stated in a recent tweet on Twitter that if a submission contains evidence such as hallucinated references or meta-comments from an AI tool, it will result in a one-year ban from submitting to ArXiv. Subsequent submissions must also be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue.

“`

### Takeaways:
– **New Policy**: ArXiv has implemented stricter guidelines for handling papers with AI-generated content.
– **Penalties**: Papers containing AI-generated work deemed inappropriate (e.g., plagiarized, biased) will face a one-year ban from submission to the repository.
– **Validation Requirement**: Authors must ensure their work is independently reviewed by a reputable venue post-submission.

Stay ahead of AI. Get the most important stories delivered to your inbox — no spam, no noise.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email Name

Email *

Submit