The arXiv preprint server announced that submitters of AI-generated content containing hallucinations will face a one-year ban. Thomas Dietterich, an emeritus professor at Oregon State University and a member of the editorial advisory council, confirmed the policy on social media. This measure targets fake citations, unedited prompt responses, and nonsensical diagrams that have recently appeared in the scientific literature. Anyone violating this rule must also undergo peer review before future publications are hosted on the platform. The announcement addresses a growing problem where AI tools produce text that slips past editors and reviewers without clear consequences for the responsible parties.
This shift moves enforcement earlier in the publication process, preceding traditional journal review. It signals that preprint servers are taking direct responsibility for content quality rather than relying solely on downstream academic filters. The rule applies specifically to inappropriate AI-produced material within the physics and astronomy sections, though similar fields may follow. The ban aims to reduce the volume of low-quality submissions that clutter the database and obscure legitimate research.
* Violators are banned from submitting for one year.
* Future submissions from affected users require peer review.
* The policy targets specific AI hallucinations like fake citations.
