Simon Willison watched a TikTok video from creator @therealcornpop which highlighted a specific flaw in AI-generated scripts for short-form video. The creator noted that the content lacks a definitive voice or any genuine opinion on the subject matter. This observation points to a pattern where algorithms produce text that sounds deep but remains hollow due to an absence of personal perspective. The issue extends beyond generic structural cliches like the rule of three or excessive punctuation. Instead, the core problem is the inability of current models to inject a unique human viewpoint into the narrative. Viewers can instantly recognise when a script has no authorial stance because the delivery feels detached and impersonal. This phenomenon suggests that relying solely on automation for creative writing strips the content of its essential emotional resonance. Without a clear authorial presence, the resulting videos fail to connect with audiences who value authenticity. The critique serves as a reminder that technical proficiency does not automatically translate into engaging communication. AI tools may handle syntax and structure efficiently, but they struggle to replicate the conviction found in human thought. Consequently, content generated without human oversight often feels flat and indistinguishable from other machine outputs.
* The critique focuses specifically on the lack of opinion in generated scripts.
* Viewers can immediately identify AI text by its absence of voice.
* Authenticity remains a barrier that current automation cannot cross.