Agent Execution Tax: new procurement metric for browser agent benchmarks?

One model paid a 22.9% Agent Execution Tax (wasted / productive inference). The same model that looked cheapest per token cost 2.3x…

By AI Maestro May 21, 2026 1 min read
Agent Execution Tax: new procurement metric for browser agent benchmarks?
Agent Execution Tax: new procurement metric for browser agent benchmarks?

One model paid a 22.9% Agent Execution Tax (wasted / productive inference). The same model that looked cheapest per token cost 2.3x more per successful task. Ran 720 browser agent tasks across these four models on the WebVoyager benchmark. Open-weight models held their own against Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Highlights:

– MiniMax M2.5: 2.3x cheaper per successful task than Gemini

– GLM-5: highest accuracy (57.1%), strongest on structured data

– Kimi K2.5: 0% parse retries across 852 calls (Gemini was 18.6%)

What surprised us: open-weight models are now winning agent benchmarks not because they got smarter but because they’re more reliable per call.

Token pricing comparisons are misleading once retries compound.

Full benchmark + reproducibility steps in the link

submitted by /u/ogandrea
[link] [comments]


Originally published at reddit.com. Curated by AI Maestro.

Stay ahead of AI. Get the most important stories delivered to your inbox — no spam, no noise.

Name
Scroll to Top